—In French law, the theoretical basis of the judicial intervention to the disagreement among shareholders has undergone an important evolution: the modern tendency is to abandon the traditional theories of abuse of power and abuse of right, and adopt the theory of duty of good faith of shareholders. The present article is an intensive study of this evolution. It seeks to analyze the defects of the traditional theories, and point out the advantages of the new theory and its revelatory effect.
—Abuse of power, abuse of right, duty of good faith, disagreement.
Rongxin Zeng is with the School of Law, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330032 China (e-mail: email@example.com). Jia Li is with Faculty of Foreign Studies, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, 341000 China (e-mail: Lijiafirstname.lastname@example.org).
Cite:Rongxin Zeng and Jia Li, "The Theoretical Basis of Judicial Intervention to Disagreements among Shareholders in French Law," International Journal of Social Science and Humanity vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70-73, 2013.