- Volume 13 Number 1 ( Feb. 2023)
- Volume 13 Number 2 ( April. 2023)
- Volume 13 Number 3 (Jun. 2023)
- Volume 13 Number 4 (Aug. 2023)
- Volume 13 Number 5 ( Oct. 2023)
- Volume 13 Number 6 ( Dec. 2023)
- Volume 12 Number 1 ( Feb. 2022)
- Volume 12 Number 2 ( May. 2022)
- Volume 12 Number 3 (Aug. 2022)
- Volume 12 Number 4 ( Nov. 2022)
- Volume 11 Number 1 ( Feb. 2021)
- Volume 11 Number 2 ( May. 2021)
- Volume 11 Number 3 (Aug. 2021)
- Volume 11 Number 4 ( Nov. 2021)
- Volume 10 Number 1 ( Feb. 2020)
- Volume 10 Number 2 ( May. 2020)
- Volume 10 Number 3 (Aug. 2020)
- Volume 10 Number 4 ( Nov. 2020)
- Volume 9 Number 1 ( Feb. 2019)
- Volume 9 Number 2 ( May. 2019)
- Volume 9 Number 3 ( Aug. 2019)
- Volume 9 Number 4 ( Nov. 2019)
- Volume 8 Number 1 ( Jan. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 2 (Feb. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 3 (Mar. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 4 (Apr. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 5 (May. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 6 (Jun. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 7 (Jul. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 8 (Aug. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 9 (Sep. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 10 (Oct. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 11 (Nov. 2018)
- Volume 8 Number 12 (Dec. 2018)
- Volume 7 Number 1 (Jan. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 2 (Feb. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 3 (Mar. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 4 (April. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 5 (May. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 6 (Jun. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 7 (Jul. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 8 (Aug. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 9 (Sep. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 10 ( Oct. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 11 ( Nov. 2017)
- Volume 7 Number 12 ( Dec. 2017)
- Volume 6 Number 1 (Jan. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 2 (Feb. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 3 (Mar. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 4 (Apr. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 5 (May 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 6 (Jun. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 7 (Jul. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 8 (Aug. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 9 (Sep. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 10 (Oct. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 11 (Nov. 2016)
- Volume 6 Number 12 (Dec. 2016)
- Volume 5 Number 1 (Jan. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 2 (Feb. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 3 (Mar. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 4 (Apr. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 5 (May 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 6 (Jun. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 7 (Jul. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 8 (Aug. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 9 (Sep. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 10 (Oct. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 11 (Nov. 2015)
- Volume 5 Number 12 (Dec. 2015)
- Volume 4 Number 1 (Jan. 2014)
- Volume 4 Number 2 (Mar. 2014)
- Volume 4 Number 3 (May 2014)
- Volume 4 Number 4 (Jul. 2014)
- Volume 4 Number 5 (Sep. 2014)
- Volume 4 Number 6 (Nov. 2014)
- Volume 3 Number 1 (Jan. 2013)
- Volume 3 Number 2 (Mar. 2013)
- Volume 3 Number 3 (May 2013)
- Volume 3 Number 4 (Jul. 2013)
- Volume 3 Number 5 (Sep. 2013)
- Volume 3 Number 6 (Nov. 2013)
- Volume 2 Number 1 (Jan. 2012)
- Volume 2 Number 2 (Mar. 2012)
- Volume 2 Number 3 (May 2012)
- Volume 2 Number 4 (Jul. 2012)
- Volume 2 Number 5 (Sep. 2012)
- Volume 2 Number 6 (Nov. 2012)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
- ISSN: 2010-3646 (Online)
- Abbreviated Title: Int. J. Social. Scienc. Humanit.
- Frequency: Bimonthly
- DOI: 10.18178/IJSSH
- Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Paul Sudnik
- Executive Editor: Ms. Yoyo Y. Zhou
- Abstracting/ Indexing: Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Crossref, Electronic Journals Library
- E-mail: ijssh.editorial.office@gmail.com
Home> Archive> 2013> Volume 3 Number 1 (Jan. 2013)
IJSSH 2013 Vol.3(1): 70-73 ISSN: 2010-3646
DOI: 10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.197
DOI: 10.7763/IJSSH.2013.V3.197
The Theoretical Basis of Judicial Intervention to Disagreements among Shareholders in French Law
Rongxin Zeng and Jia Li
Abstract—In French law, the theoretical basis of the judicial intervention to the disagreement among shareholders has undergone an important evolution: the modern tendency is to abandon the traditional theories of abuse of power and abuse of right, and adopt the theory of duty of good faith of shareholders. The present article is an intensive study of this evolution. It seeks to analyze the defects of the traditional theories, and point out the advantages of the new theory and its revelatory effect.
Index Terms—Abuse of power, abuse of right, duty of good faith, disagreement.
Rongxin Zeng is with the School of Law, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330032 China (e-mail: zrx0501@gmail.com). Jia Li is with Faculty of Foreign Studies, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, 341000 China (e-mail: Lijia-lyn@hotmail.com).
Index Terms—Abuse of power, abuse of right, duty of good faith, disagreement.
Rongxin Zeng is with the School of Law, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330032 China (e-mail: zrx0501@gmail.com). Jia Li is with Faculty of Foreign Studies, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, 341000 China (e-mail: Lijia-lyn@hotmail.com).
Cite:Rongxin Zeng and Jia Li, "The Theoretical Basis of Judicial Intervention to Disagreements among Shareholders in French Law," International Journal of Social Science and Humanity vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70-73, 2013.